20 C
Sunday, October 24, 2021

Mozambique: Hidden Money owed – Defence Legal professionals Attempt Once more to Gag the Press

Must read

Nigeria: Premium Occasions Investigation Wins West African Journalism Award

Mr Olufemi expressed gratitude to the Premium Occasions Centre for Investigative Journalism and to Premium Occasions crew members for the story. A PREMIUM TIMES...

Coronavirus has negatively impacted conservation tourism

It’s been over 20 months for the reason that WHO introduced Covid-19 as a world well being emergency and pandemic. It’s estimated that...

12 Cool Issues To Do In Bologna

Bologna is a confident metropolis with a medieval historical past and a younger edgy vibe. Linger in moody wine bars, stroll the porticoes...

Maputo — At the beginning on Friday of the 12th day of the trial of 19 individuals accused of crimes in reference to Mozambique’s largest ever monetary scandal, referred to as the “hidden money owed” defence attorneys tried, for the third time, to gag the press, and for the third time the choose, Efigenio Baptista, rejected their request.

Jaime Sunda, the lawyer for Renato Matusse, a political adviser to former President Armando Guebuza, demanded that there needs to be no stay broadcasting of the testimony given by his consumer. He claimed that broadcasting the picture and the voice of Matusse would injury his proper to honour and his good identify.

Baptista replied that there was a conflict of rules concerned. The Mozambican structure did certainly enshrine the best to honour and to at least one’s good identify. But it surely additionally enshrined the precept of freedom of the press and that trials are public,

When two proper of equal constitutional standing conflict, “the court docket should resolve which proper prevails”, mentioned Baptista. “And on this case, the court docket has determined that the trial is public. The court docket will not be going to vary its thoughts”.

“You are able to do no matter you assume is correct for the defence of your shoppers”, he informed the attorneys, “however the matter has already been determined. You may make this request as many occasions as you want, however nothing will change”.

Sunda retorted that the defence attorneys will now enchantment in opposition to the choose’s ruling.

Baptista had dominated to maintain trial public, with stay broadcasts, proper initially of the proceedings, and once more on Thursday. However the attorneys are persisting – a few of their shoppers clearly don’t need the general public to know what occurred beneath the Guebuza.

An offended alternate occurred later within the morning, when defence attorneys claimed that prosecuting lawyer Sheila Marrengula was utilizing a parallel case file to which the defence didn’t have entry. Each Baptista and Marrengula discovered the accusation absurd.